|
|
Above:
the lines of the Visa are unmistakably Gallic, with a short, steeply
sloping bonnet. This is the flat twin Citroen-engined version
|
NO
OTHER European nation buys so few of its competitors' cars, which is as
it should be for the country which originated the word chauvinist.
European Economic Community or no, France remains the most individual
of the voices of Europe. In more than merely official and l’Académie
française
circles the French resist the pollution of their tongue by other
languages especially English and American to the point perhaps of
appearing sometimes to be unaware of English.
|
Right: The
front, third crankshaft bearing is cantilevered ahead of the camshaft
drive gear. The pistons run direct in the aluminium cylinder barrels
which are plastic coated. One ignition triggering "slug" can be seen in
the cutaway section at the top of the flywheel
Below:
on the Citroen-engined Visa the engine is cantilvered ahead of the
transmission, with the steering rack placed well back behind the
suspension arm. The fuel tank is located beneath the luggage area floor.
|
|
That
seemed to be confirmed back in May when the first leaks about the new
Citroen occurred; was it really to be called the VD? We gather that
there was genuine embarrassment on the quai André Citroen when
the difficulty was explained. French jokes may be French, but never
coarse. The designation was simply an internal factory/design office
one - like ADO 88 or W123 or C7 perhaps, esoteric code names which are
bandied about only by the company - and every industry and technical
journalist? Well yes - but the more acceptable word Visa was quickly
put about as the car's suitably international name.
For, perhaps
contrary in some ways to both French chauvinism and Citroen
individualism, the Citroen Visa is intended to be an international car
and it continues the apparent trend in Citroen babies towards less
dominance by the Citroen parent. It still looks like its Citroen father
- it couldn't help that with such a papa - but mère Peugeot shows up
when you look at the children's legs and feet and indeed heart in the
case of the elder brother. There are essentially two cars based on an
air-cooled twin which is very much a Citroen unit and a four which is
Peugeot’s water-cooled 104 engine. The twin powers two models, the 4CV
Visa Special and Club, and the four the top version the 5CV Visa Super.
The French taxation horsepower figures mark the Visa's place in the
Citroen range, filling the considerable gap between the 2CV/Dyane and
the much larger GS. From tyre contact patches to floor pan it is
virtually a Peugeot 104, with very nearly the same wheelbases - the
plural will be explained later - and track and 5in. extra length. That
puts its nominally 97 1/2in. wheelbase 1 1/4in. bigger than the 2CV and
1 1/4in. shorter than the GS and its 12ft 2 1/4in. overall length very
much shorter than both – 5 1/2in. less than the sprawly 2CV and nearly
17in. less than the considerable 13ft 6in. of the GS. Dimensionally the
Visa is something of a revolution in Citroens since it is the only
four-door car they make which even distantly follows Issigonis'
precepts of compactness as Peugeot had done before with the 104.
Forgetting the curious little LN which is really a two-door Peugeot
again Citroens have always sprawled, even the 2CV.
To put it into international perspective, the Visa has near enough the
same wheelbase as the Austin Allegro and the Fiat 128 but is roughly
6in. shorter than both. No details of interior space were to hand as
this was written but since Citroen who have never been anything like as
niggardly about space inside as most other makers (again, lssigonis/BL
honourably excepted), say that the car is "exceptionally spacious for a
car of its class" one can assume that the job has been done properly
with regard for all occupants.
|
|
New air-cooled twin
The smaller of the two front-wheel-drive engines marks the appearance
of what may be the largest possible stretch of the 2CV power unit. It
is of course a flat twin horizontally opposed with pushrod operated
"overhead" valves but there are several interesting differences.
The capacity has been increased from the 2CV6's 602 c.c. (74 x 70mm
bore and stroke) to 652 c.c. by increasing the bore to 77 mm; that is
done by doing away with the usual cast iron liner and cutting each bore
directly in its aluminium alloy barrel. The bores are coated with a
silicon-based compound called "nicasil" originally developed for the
Citroen Comotor Wankel engine as a wear-resistant lining for the
trochoid surface. Like several other questions arising from the limited
information so far available from France we hope to learn how the
coating is applied during a coming chance to drive the Visa abroad. The
compression ratio is higher at 9-to-1 so that power goes up by a no
doubt useful 38 per cent from 26 to 36 bhp at the same 5500 rpm. This
represents noticeably higher tuning; the 2CV6 unit is delivering only a
modest 43 bhp/litre while the Visa 4CV is working at 55 bhp/litre.
Torque increases from 305 lb. ft. to 38 lb. ft. at the same 3500 rpm a
24 per cent increase; cam profiles are special designed to ensure good
low speed torque. To cope with the extra power it would seem that the
crankcase must have been changed since the crankshaft now sits in three
instead of two bearings which is claimed to reduce noise and vibration
greatly. Most interesting of the twin's features is its genuine
entirely electronic ignition developed by the French electronic company
Thomson in collaboration with Citroen.
|
Again
only general details are to hand. Referring to the illustration of the
components of the system two proximity detectors (2) (perhaps Hall
effect transistor type) arranged at 10 and 45 deg before top dead
centre detect the passing of a metallic slug (1) fixed in the flywheel
delivering timing pulses to a computer (4). A vacuum-sensing transducer
(3) attached to the inlet manifold side of the carburettor supplies the
computer with an indication of engine load. The circuit is completed by
the coil (5) ignition switch (7) and battery (8).
The two proximity
detector positions correspond to the extremes of the ignition timing
required - static advance (10deg) and maximum advance (45deg). Taking
engine load and speed into consideration the computer works out when
the spark impulse should be delivered for all conditions between these
two extremes to the coil which does its usual job of amplifying the
primary current to the necessary l5 or so kV secondary output.
Besides the obvious advantages of no mechanical ignition parts to wear
and therefore no need for any adjustments Citroen point out that this
system provides a constant shape advance curve throughout the engine’s
life and one which is ideally suited to the engine so that it has
improved fuel consumption exhaust pollution low speed torque and
acceleration. They also claim that the higher plug voltage improves
cold starting even with a partly discharged battery. The minimum
cranking speed needed for successful ignition is 20 rpm. It is said
that plug life is improved too. For the transmission Citroen borrow
from the GS rather than from the 2CV presumably in search of the more
modern box's greater torque/weight capacity better refinement and more
conventional gearchange - although the linkage to the remote control
looks rather 2CV-ish. Ratios are specially chosen to suit the new
application with overall gearing set at 13.16 mph per lOOO rpm which
corresponds to 72 mph at peak power speed.
Peugeot 104 four-cylinder engine
The Visa Super uses the four-cylinder light-alloy single ohc transverse
engine and transmission of the Peugeot 104 which is produced at Douvrin
by the Société Française de Mecanique with modifications to gear ratios
and cooling to suit the Visa. There appear to be no surprises here - no
electronic ignition and no mention of any measures to improve the
unit's now well-known failing of unacceptably high gear noise. With one
size larger wheels than the Special and Club - 145-13in. instead of
135-13in. - and a higher overall ratio the Super is geared at 1728 mph
per 1000 rpm giving 108 mph at the engine's peak power. Citroen claim a
top speed of only 89 mph which indicates that fourth gear is a true
overdrive.
It is the more compact proportions of the 104 transverse arrangement
compared with the longitudinal spread of the traditional Citroen
fore-and-aft twin layout that account for the fact that there is a
difference of 1/2in in the wheelbases of the two basic cars. The 4CV
Special and Club models have the longer wheelbase to avoid the
intrusion of the transmission into the passenger compartment.
Suspension and steering
Another Citroen-versus-Peugeot confrontation occurs in the steering of
the two types. Both are rack and pinion - a Citroen feature since
prewar days of traction avant Light 15 and so on - but that on the
Super is a slightly higher-ratio'd Peugeot arrangement where the
smaller-engined cars have a Citroen-designed set-up. The narrower
section tyres on the 4CV allow it a slightly tighter turning circle
-for a front-wheel drive car an excellent 3Oft 6in. is claimed between
kerbs (6in. larger for the 5CV). Suspension is Peugeot 104 sorry
Citroen LN suitably adapted in rates and so on to the new application -
MacPherson strut in front with an anti-roll bar and trailing arm
behind. Brakes use LN drums at the back and a new Citroen-designed disc
type in front.
|
|
Body and interior design
Mergers may have trimmed Citroen's design team into continuing further
along the path of group rationalisation - they themselves put it
another way saying that "the Visa is an example of what can be achieved
by a design office which is determined to express the true personality
of its marque while using the full resources of a large industrial
group." But you can't keep a Citroen draughtsman down when it comes to
ideas about control ergonomics. CX philosophies reappear at the
predictably single-spoke steering wheel with the familiar effort to
group almost all controls needed whilst driving close to the wheel. The
most striking item is a set of switches and warning lamps arranged on
and in a cylinder which being set tangentially to the wheel rim lies at
an angle. Not surprisingly Citroen dub it "the satellite"; its three
parts carry (top) wipers and washer controls signalling and horn
(middle) and lamps master switch dipswitch and flashing (lower).
Heating and ventilation are controlled from the right. Other switches
are provided across the middle of the control "column" and each side of
the steering wheel hub - a typically Citroen layout.
Large sensible trays with easy wide-open access are there below the
facia in contrast to the GS and there are what look like generous
heating and ventilation outlets suggesting that one can demist side
windows. The tall quite well raked square proportions of the windscreen
once again permit the manufacturer to get away with one large centrally
pivoted wiper arm. Unlike the GS the rear hatch opens to leave a sill
whose lip is 29in. above the ground. The rear seat back is of course
one that can be folded out of the way for maximum load carrying. The
inconvenience of the sill when compared with the GS's beautifully clear
lip-less low load floor is compensated for by the obvious saving in
weight (due to the stiffening effect of the sill panel) and the very
much more practical bumpering at the back. One would imagine that a
rear end dent in the GS's centre bumper which is part of the door can
be quite expensive; the design of the Visa's integral-with-body
thermoplastic-on-metal-former bumpering looks like a reaction to GS
experience especially as it is claimed to remain undamaged in
parking-speed collisions at up to about 2 1/2 mph. The body shape
itself looks as good aerodynamically as one could hope for on such a
short tall car. Apparently Citroen engineers admit that they are not
very pleased with a drag coefficient not much better than the 104 body;
an improvement from around 0.44 to 0.41 is suspected.
Overall an interesting departure for this most interesting of all
passenger-carrying car makers. It looks and sounds very much like the
work of a precocious wilful child curbed carefully by an intelligent
sensible mother the child making the best of things when showing what
he has done by talking bravely of how "this approach to the creation of
a new car design while allowing a considerably shorter gestation period
ensures that the vehicle will be reliable from the moment of its
launching." That's what mère Peugeot told him to say and the maddening
thing is that the old spoilsport's probably right.
|
Above: Peugeot-engined versions
of the Visa can be distinguished by the rubbing strake along the sides
and different wheel trims |
|
Above: the location of the switch panel can be
clearly seen with the instruments in a separate cowling
Below: Despite the Visa's small size, rear
seat leg room appears to be generous
|
|
|
The
drum-shaped switch panel for indicators lamps and horn is on the left
with heater controls on the other side. Figures 1 2 4 and 7 are fresh
air inlets with No. 3 the control for the centre vent. Figs 6 and 8 are
controls for heater flow direction and fan with ashtray (5) and a
further fresh air vent (7) between |
SPECIFICATION |
ENGINE |
Special/Club |
Super |
Cylinders |
2, opposed |
4, in line |
Cooling |
Air |
Water |
Bore/stroke mm |
77 / 70 |
72 / 69 |
Capacity, c.c. |
652 |
1124 |
Compression ratio |
9.0 |
9.2 |
Max. power/rpm (DIN) |
36 / 5500 |
57 / 6520 |
Max. torque/rpm (DIN) |
38 / 3500 |
59 / 3000 |
TRANSMISSION |
|
|
Ratio/mph per 1000 rpm |
|
1st |
4.54 / 3.32 |
3.88 / 4.64 |
2nd |
2.50 / 6.04 |
2.29 / 7.84 |
3rd |
1.64 / 9.19 |
1.50 / 11.99 |
4th |
1.14 / 13.16 |
1.04 / 17.28 |
Reverse |
4.18 / 3.61 |
3.56 / 5.05 |
Final drive ratio |
4.125 to 1 |
3.563 to 1 |
TYRES |
135-13 Michelin XZX |
145-13 Michelin XZX |
STEERING |
Rack & pinion |
Rack & pinion |
Steering ratio |
19.3 to 1 |
18.38 to 1 |
Turning circle (walls) |
32ft 4in |
32ft 5in |
Turning circle (kerbs) |
30ft 6in |
31ft 0in |
DIMENSIONS |
|
|
Length (in/mm) |
146.5 / 3721 |
146.5 / 3721 |
Width |
59.5 / 1511 |
60.5 / 1537 |
Wheelbase |
95.3 / 2419 |
95.3 / 2419 |
Height |
55.5 / 1410 |
55.8 / 1417 |
Track front |
50.8 / 1289 |
50.8 / 1289 |
Track rear |
48.8 / 1238 |
48.8 / 1238 |
WEIGHT (lb) |
|
|
Kerb |
1621 |
1764 |
PERFORMANCE |
|
|
400m |
21.9 sec |
19.9 sec |
1000m |
41.8 sec |
37.6 sec |
0-62 mph |
26.2 sec |
16.6 sec |
Maximum Speed |
77 mph |
89 mph |
CONSUMPTION (Official figures) |
Steady 56 mph |
49.6 mpg |
45.6 mpg |
Steady 75 mph |
- |
33.6 mpg |
Urban driving |
37.2 mpg |
33.6 mpg |
Tank capacity |
8.8 gall (40 litres) |
8.8 gall (40 litres) |
|